<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spytector Review: The Only &#8216;Totally Unbiased&#8217; Spytector Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nofullstop.com/2009/04/09/spytector-review-the-only-totally-unbiased-spytector-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nofullstop.com/2009/04/09/spytector-review-the-only-totally-unbiased-spytector-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:28:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legal</title>
		<link>http://www.nofullstop.com/2009/04/09/spytector-review-the-only-totally-unbiased-spytector-review/comment-page-1/#comment-236535</link>
		<dc:creator>Legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofullstop.com/?p=1913#comment-236535</guid>
		<description>Definitely imagine that that you said. Your favourite reason appeared to be at the web the easiest thing to keep in mind of. I say to you, I definitely get irked whilst folks consider concerns that they just don&#039;t realize about. You managed to hit the nail upon the highest and defined out the entire thing without having side effect , people can take a signal. Will probably be again to get more. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely imagine that that you said. Your favourite reason appeared to be at the web the easiest thing to keep in mind of. I say to you, I definitely get irked whilst folks consider concerns that they just don&#8217;t realize about. You managed to hit the nail upon the highest and defined out the entire thing without having side effect , people can take a signal. Will probably be again to get more. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.nofullstop.com/2009/04/09/spytector-review-the-only-totally-unbiased-spytector-review/comment-page-1/#comment-161218</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofullstop.com/?p=1913#comment-161218</guid>
		<description>As with most Internet reviews this one is not much use as it is not dated. SO there is no clue as to the version reviewed and it is impossible to know if maybe the reported problems have now been fixed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with most Internet reviews this one is not much use as it is not dated. SO there is no clue as to the version reviewed and it is impossible to know if maybe the reported problems have now been fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TGForums</title>
		<link>http://www.nofullstop.com/2009/04/09/spytector-review-the-only-totally-unbiased-spytector-review/comment-page-1/#comment-157878</link>
		<dc:creator>TGForums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofullstop.com/?p=1913#comment-157878</guid>
		<description>I like your review, but I must disagree with some points, and point out another thing: 
 
The reason the email features don&#039;t work with Yahoo is because Yahoo&#039;s SMTP service is paid-only. You have to buy a subscription with them in order for it to work with their servers (that goes for EVERY keylogger). In order for the program to send an email, it needs to connect through the SMTP server of the hosting email provider. If it does not have access (which free Yahoo users don&#039;t have), it will not work at all. That&#039;s why I recommend using GMail as it&#039;s free and there are no SMTP restrictions that would affect a keylogger. 
 
Secondly, you state that no other keyloggers on the market are undetectable... That is a lie, and to prove it to you I will give you a copy of the keylogger I created, TGEYE  &lt;a href=&quot;http://(http://tgforums.com/TGEYE),&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(http://tgforums.com/TGEYE),&lt;/a&gt; for absolutely free, just to prove to you that there are other detectable keyloggers out there. I guarantee you that TGEYE, which only costs $29.99, is 100% fully undetectable as well. It is both email and FTP capable, and can do pretty much everything your $229 software can, minus logging both side of chats (plus a few extras as well). 
 
We&#039;ve also received great reviews on sites like keyloggerdownloads.net and keyloggerreviews.info, so saying other keylogger don&#039;t work is a very false statement. 
 
Otherwise, I do like the review. It&#039;s very solid and information about the product for those that don&#039;t understand much of computers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your review, but I must disagree with some points, and point out another thing: </p>
<p>The reason the email features don&#039;t work with Yahoo is because Yahoo&#039;s SMTP service is paid-only. You have to buy a subscription with them in order for it to work with their servers (that goes for EVERY keylogger). In order for the program to send an email, it needs to connect through the SMTP server of the hosting email provider. If it does not have access (which free Yahoo users don&#039;t have), it will not work at all. That&#039;s why I recommend using GMail as it&#039;s free and there are no SMTP restrictions that would affect a keylogger. </p>
<p>Secondly, you state that no other keyloggers on the market are undetectable&#8230; That is a lie, and to prove it to you I will give you a copy of the keylogger I created, TGEYE  <a href="http://(http://tgforums.com/TGEYE)," rel="nofollow">(</a><a href="http://tgforums.com/TGEYE" rel="nofollow">http://tgforums.com/TGEYE</a>), for absolutely free, just to prove to you that there are other detectable keyloggers out there. I guarantee you that TGEYE, which only costs $29.99, is 100% fully undetectable as well. It is both email and FTP capable, and can do pretty much everything your $229 software can, minus logging both side of chats (plus a few extras as well). </p>
<p>We&#039;ve also received great reviews on sites like keyloggerdownloads.net and keyloggerreviews.info, so saying other keylogger don&#039;t work is a very false statement. </p>
<p>Otherwise, I do like the review. It&#039;s very solid and information about the product for those that don&#039;t understand much of computers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John G</title>
		<link>http://www.nofullstop.com/2009/04/09/spytector-review-the-only-totally-unbiased-spytector-review/comment-page-1/#comment-147187</link>
		<dc:creator>John G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofullstop.com/?p=1913#comment-147187</guid>
		<description>I am wondering if it still does not capture both sides of Yahoo 9.0 and above. That is a huge downside for me, </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering if it still does not capture both sides of Yahoo 9.0 and above. That is a huge downside for me,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

