<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expert Marketers And Power StumbleUpon Users Won&#8217;t Get You The &#8216;Real&#8217; StumbleUpon Traffic. Content Will!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nofullstop.com/2009/04/29/expert-marketers-and-power-stumbleupon-users-wont-get-you-the-real-stumbleupon-traffic-content-will/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nofullstop.com/2009/04/29/expert-marketers-and-power-stumbleupon-users-wont-get-you-the-real-stumbleupon-traffic-content-will/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:28:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.nofullstop.com/2009/04/29/expert-marketers-and-power-stumbleupon-users-wont-get-you-the-real-stumbleupon-traffic-content-will/comment-page-1/#comment-123004</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofullstop.com/?p=2181#comment-123004</guid>
		<description>I am among the power users (&#039;Top Stumblers&#039;) of StumbleUpon for quite some time already and I can confirm that the analysis presented in this article is correct.  Heavy promotion of low quality content makes no sense, even if such is done by SU users with a strong profile and even in case of may stumbles and/or reviews. Fresh high quality content that is rapidly recognized as such by ordinary users in SU performs best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am among the power users (&#8216;Top Stumblers&#8217;) of StumbleUpon for quite some time already and I can confirm that the analysis presented in this article is correct.  Heavy promotion of low quality content makes no sense, even if such is done by SU users with a strong profile and even in case of may stumbles and/or reviews. Fresh high quality content that is rapidly recognized as such by ordinary users in SU performs best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speakbnidas</title>
		<link>http://www.nofullstop.com/2009/04/29/expert-marketers-and-power-stumbleupon-users-wont-get-you-the-real-stumbleupon-traffic-content-will/comment-page-1/#comment-122951</link>
		<dc:creator>Speakbnidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofullstop.com/?p=2181#comment-122951</guid>
		<description>Really good one. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really good one. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

